Search for: "In Re Application of the United States for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2703(d) (1)"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
In re Application of the United States of America for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:42 am
If these three conditions are met, the court does not have the discretion to refuse to grant the order.8 See In re Application of the United States for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 7:42 am
If these three conditions are met, the court does not have the discretion to refuse to grant the order.8 See In re Application of the United States for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
District Court for the District of Columbia: In re Application of the United States of America for Nondisclosure Order, 2014 WL 1273227 (2014) (“In re Application, supra”). [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:20 am
In re Application for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:12 am
August 27, 2010): The United States seeks an order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:20 pm
Image by Sean MacEntee via FlickrUnited States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Judge Liam O'Grady, in a three-page Memorandum and Opinion in In Re Application of the United States of America for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 2703(d) [Case No. 1:11-dm-00003-TCB], this week denied a request by Birgitta Jonsdottir, Jacob Appelbaum and Rop Gonggrijp to shield their… [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 10:44 pm
to Protect User from Warrantless Email Search. eff.org has the unsealed documents in In Re Application of the United States of America for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2703(d). [read post]
4 May 2008, 11:08 am
§ 2701 et seq., and 18 U.S.C. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
The § 2703(d) order covered 67 days of MetroPCS records. [read post]
7 May 2015, 6:53 am
In re Application of the United States, 620 F.3d 304 (2010). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:39 pm
Warshak had the contents of his private e-mail accounts obtained from his ISP without a warrant pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2703(b). [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 10:42 am
In an effort to link the defendants to the other robberies, officers sought court orders under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm
Magistrate Judge Orenstein’s Opinion The basic reasoning of the opinion follows these steps: (1) The government has applied for a “specific and articulable facts” court order commanding the phone company to disclose historical cell-site information pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2703(c). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
See, e.g., In re Synchronoss Sec. [read post]
